Out of my window at dusk on Sunday.
MORE
Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Wednesday, February 01, 2012
DIGI-ME ON QARRTSILUNI
Part of my 2006 series of digitally
painted self-portraits "in-the-manner-of"
are included in the latest issue
of qarrtsiluni whose current theme is Imitation.
I'm so happy to appear again in this
consistently, persistently, stubbornly excellent online
magazine.
MORE
Speaking of digital
painting (Hi Hockney! I don't have an
iPad but my Wacom graphic tablet has been in constant
use since 2004) I love it, it's fun, absorbing, exciting
and stimulating to my eye and hand and brain but something
entirely different takes place during a direct interaction
of the hand and the whole mind-body with a live,
un-mediated surface in a live un-mediated environment.
I can't define what that difference is and I can't be
entirely certain that it's better than its digitally
orchestrated version, but somebody sometime somewhere
will surely write a thesis on this subject.
Labels:
digital painting,
graphic tablet,
Hockney,
iPad,
self-portraits,
Wacom
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
DAVID HOCKNEY: does size matter?
Yesterday I went to see this very
BIG exhibition
at the Royal Academy.
David Hockney is loveable. The
politely jostling, smiling crowds lining up to bask in
the glow of his latest pictures surely agree. His
status as a National Treasure is not in doubt and even
though he's lived a large part of his life in
Los Angeles, Englishness can never be divorced from Hockney
anymore than it can be from cups of tea, Monty Python
or the Beatles. However, California did leave large thumb-prints
in the Hockney psyche and, in my
irrelevant opinion, that is a shame.
Before I launch
into my critique, I must affirm
that I am among those who love Hockney. I wish he was
my friend so that we could have stimulating conversations
about painting, buzzing with insight and discovery. I
love his mercurial enthusiasms, his analytical and perceptive
eye, his humour, impishness and no-bullshit bluntness,
his inventiveness, committment,
and the loneliness lurking behind the panache. So, with
all that loveability plus the National Treasure status
to contend with, I feel rather hesitant about airing
my view of the current exhibition. There must be many
sycophants in Hockney's entourage and I wonder if even
his friends dare express anything along the lines
of: hey, Emperor, aren't you feeling the cold?
Well, here goes. Deep breath.
Too many of the paintings in this
show are there because of their BIGNESS, because
that was the agreed gimmick, but I can't believe
that the curators, and Hockney himself in his heart of
hearts, could not see the eye-watering superficiality
of, for instance:The Arrival of Spring
in Woldgate, East Yorkshire (oil on 32 canvases
joined together). As a cheery restaurant mural or a backdrop
for a Disney frolic, okay, it could work. But the
appropriate format for it is a greeting card, ordinary
greeting card size. What is the point
of a super-gigantic painting, whether on a single canvas
or a grid of 32 canvases, if everything about it is small
and superficial, both in concept and execution?
As for
the painting inexplicably chosen for the poster and
all the advertising:Winter
Timber 2009, am I the only one who
sees limp spaghetti or McDonald fries instead of
logs laid out on the road? Is it possible that the
famously acute Hockney eye did not notice this unfortunate
ressemblance? As a brilliant draughtsman,
how could he be satisfied with this banal
image, which doesn't even have the saving grace of
being a joke? Contrary to the BIGGER PICTURE theme
of the exhibition, it is the largest works which
are the least interesting, the most contrived, whereas
it is in smaller single canvases, sketchbooks,
and some marvellous charcoal drawings of trees that
the unique Hockney talent is evident.
David Hockney Winter Timber 2009 (oil
on 15 canvases)
Van Gogh in Arles was obviously
on Hockney's mind much of the time when he was painting
en plein air in Yorkshire but Vincent's engagement
and struggle with nature is a world away from David's
in every respect. I don't mean this negatively: my favourite
landscapes in this show are those in which Hockney has
translated Van Gogh into Hockney-ish. My least favourites
are those in which he lets his California, or rather
his Hollywood, take over his Yorkshire. The iPad-ish
cleverness, laid-back speediness, ice-cream colours and
shadowless light, the cinematic showmanship - all very
L.A.
But the Hockney I
deeply admire is the terrifically original boy
of the 1960s and 70s, before California had seeped
into his Bradford psyche.
His paintings, drawings and etchings of that period
are truly inspirational to me. Now that he's back in
England (for a while?) maybe the next stage in his
work will be the fusion of those two worlds - perhaps
a Smaller Picture, but a deeper one. David
Hockney still has a lot of creating to do.
By the
way, a lot of the reviews and catalogue commentaries
mention the fact that he painted most of these landscapes
en plein air, actually standing in front
of the actual scene, outdoors in all kinds of weather,
as though this is something extraordinary that nobody
has done since the nineteenth century. Huh? What planet
do they live on? Artists, brilliant ones as well as mediocre
ones, Sunday painters and every day painters, have never
stopped painting and drawing en plein air. So
there.
I loved the 9-camera, 18-screen
films at the end of the exhibition. Eye and mind-expanding.
If you're in London, go see this
exhibition, it's absolutely worth a long, slow look.
Disregard my comments and make up your own mind. Try
to ignore the crowds and plant yourself assertively in
front of anyone blocking your view. And
it's easier to get tickets in person at the Academy rather
than online.
Friday, January 20, 2012
RESOLUTIONS
Here is another video experiment,
deconstructing and reconstructing parts of the first
image from my ever-in-progress gnovel .
One of my unspoken New Year's resolutions is to do something
with this idea, maybe turning it into monoprints
for an artist's book, or perhaps abandoning it altogether.
Things that are left too long on the shelf tend to disintegrate
anyway, according to the law of entropy, but declaring
that you are giving up on a long-delayed project might
just re-start its motor.
To embed this video, I'm trying
out an extension I've downloaded
called the Dreamweaver Video Inserter. If you don't see
the screen at first, try again later. I haven't got
the hang of using it yet and am getting some help from
the makers.
Here's the VIMEO permalink in any case.
Here's the VIMEO permalink in any case.
MORE
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
THANKYOU
to whiskeyriver
for these two quotes which are precisely what I need to hear right now:
for these two quotes which are precisely what I need to hear right now:
"At
every moment you choose yourself. But do you choose
your self? Body and soul contain a thousand possibilities
out of which you can build many I's. But in one of
them is there a congruence of the elector and the
elected. Only one - which you will never find until
you have excluded all those superficial and fleeting
possibilities of being and doing with which you toy,
out of curiosity or wonder or greed, and which hinder
you from casting anchor in the experience of the
mystery of life, and the consciousness of the talent
entrusted to you which is your I." Dag
Hammarskjöld
The answer is never the answer. What's really interesting is the mystery. If you seek the mystery instead of the answer, you'll always be seeking. I've never seen anybody really find the answer, but they think they have. So they stop thinking. But the job is to seek mystery, evoke mystery, plant a garden in which strange plants grow and mysteries bloom. The need for mystery is greater than the need for an answer." Ken Kesey
Back soon with resolutions to resolve.
MORE
Labels:
answers,
body,
choose,
consciousness,
Dag Hammarskjold,
Ken Kesey,
mystery,
resolutions,
self,
soul
Saturday, January 07, 2012
Sunday, January 01, 2012
Sunday, December 25, 2011
SEASONAL GREETINGS
For some unknown reason, I haven't been able to upload a new post to my main Blaugustine blog (link at MORE below). If you too are unable to open it, please let me know in comments here.
Meanwhile, I want to wish everyone a happy Christmas - or whatever you may be celebrating - and a New Year that brings you all you wish for, and a little extra.
MORE
Meanwhile, I want to wish everyone a happy Christmas - or whatever you may be celebrating - and a New Year that brings you all you wish for, and a little extra.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
ETERNAL RETURN
It took me almost
the whole of December to make this very short video and
what I've learned is that I want to go back to painting.
I started with
a desire to express feelings of nostalgia,
sadness and mystery about my
Russian ancestry, my father and his relatives,
known and unknown, and bewilderment
about the impermanence of life and the tenacity
of personality, of family resemblance, of faces fusing
into other faces.
I wanted to make a video
that would be like a painting but with gentle movement
taking place at various distances from the spectator.
I built a kind of mini stage-set out of three
cardboard boxes, one inside the other, with windows cut
out of the back, roof and sides. I painted the inside
of the boxes so that when lights were placed between
them, you could see the colours of rooms behind rooms.
On sheets of acetate I printed (digitally, through
ink-jet printer) small photos of my Russian relatives,
cut them out, then hung them on gold threads from wooden
bars and from the ceilings of two front boxes. What I didn't take into consideration
was that the camera and the naked eye are two altogether
different species. The depth that my
naked eye perceived was completely lost when the camcorder
was pointed in the same direction.
Here is the final version, after discarding about
seven others. It's a compromise but I don't dislike
it. I borrowed one of Alexander
Vertinsky's songs for the soundtrack because
he fits the mood so well and because my father liked
him so much. I couldn't find a clip of his particular
favourite, which started with (pardon my phonetics
- I don't speak Russian but understand
a few words): Ti
sidish adinoke....(You sit alone, staring
at the flames....) There are lots of Vertinsky songs
on YouTube and if you like the nostalgic chansonnier style, look him up.
Here's the permalink from
VIMEO (it's a bigger screen over there) if you can't see it below.
Labels:
1920s,
Alexander Vertinsky,
ancestors,
chansonnier,
depth of field,
DNA,
family,
genealogy,
heritage,
nostalgia,
relatives,
Russian
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
A MOVING POEM
My blogging report card this month
is shameful. I'm standing in the corner, dunce
cap on my head, red-faced and staring at the floor.
Digressed
again, off-piste again, 7ism resolutions postponed
again. I don't have a valid excuse except
that I really have been thinking a lot and trying
to see where I'm at, as they say.
But I couldn't let November end
without a modest ode to falling leaves and darker days
and the melancholy of approaching winter. Another
rough experimental animation, started yesterday afternoon
and finished at about six o'clock this morning, without
a break.
I didn't choose the music beforehand
but as soon as I watched the silent video I remembered
Bachianas Brasileiras, by Heitor Villa-Lobos,
sung by the extraordinary soprano Bidù Sayao.
I've only used a short extract from Number 5 - if you've
never heard the whole thing, it's definitely worth looking
up. There are many recordings of it but Sayao's interpretation
is my absolute favourite.
This is the VIMEO permalink in
case you don't see the video here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



