To anyone who visits here
regularly,
sorry for the long gaps lately. I've been otherwise
engaged
but will return and take up all unfinished business
(including
La Vie en Rosé) very soon. Am away from
tomorrow
until early next week but meanwhile, here's an
update on
the painting. The palette and brushes in the corner
on the
right of this photo are the real ones - just in case
you're
wondering.
MORE
Wednesday, July 07, 2010
Thursday, June 24, 2010
DNA PAINTING, STATE 3
Colour slowly creeping in.
Very difficult
to keep relating it to what I'm seeing, which is
what I'm aiming to do.
MORE
MORE
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
KINDS OF GENIUS
My cyber-friend Wally (alias crackskullbob,
alias Wally Torta etc.)
who is a kind of genius - I say kind of because
that leaves
me room to escape from the authorities in case they
declare
he's not a full-blown genius - has just posted his
drawing
of me from a recent photo which I put on Julia
Kay's Portrait Party,. He accompanies this
terrific
sketch with one of his free-associating verbal
flights of imagination which are a constant
feature of his blog-writing and drawing, like the
inspired
riffs of jazz musicians. I
love this ability to leave behind the prosaic
gravity of
everyday thinking by playfully following any clue
that presents
itself - a name, a word, a passer-by, a shadow, a
sound
- and simply taking off with it, wherever it
may
lead. I say that this weightlesss
space-travelling
talent is one of the essential components of
genius in
any field, and the authorities be damned if they
disagree.
I've done a couple of new portraits for JKPP which you can see here and also on my portraits page.
MORE
I've done a couple of new portraits for JKPP which you can see here and also on my portraits page.
MORE
Sunday, June 20, 2010
CHAOS TURNING INTO DNA
I've
temporarily titled the painting My DNA. I
thought
it would be interesting to record its various
states because
the end result may be quite different to the
beginning and
it's a way to preserve the process.
Everything in the picture is an edited version of things I see around me, including parts of other artworks. Building the composition from these fragments is selectively random: if a shape catches my eye, I'll put it in but not necessarily in the same place. In this process the painting is acquiring an order that looks nothing like my cluttered studio but that you could still recognise if you walked in there.
Central to the design are the figures of my parents, five times removed from reality: I am painting them from an unfinished painting which was based on an old snapshot and they were, of course, more real than that photograph and now they are gone, though their known and unknown history is still alive in me, consciously and unconsciously, as I sit in messy upstairs studio creating an illusion of orderly space with material paints on material canvas.
In making art what has always intrigued and frustrated me is the conflict between working from life and working from imagination (which is also the conflict between abstraction and representation). I love painting from life, it's incomparably thrilling, but there always comes a point when I feel dominated, subjugated by the real and want it to get out of my way. Then down and down, round and round I go to that old black magic of inner images and concepts and that's exciting too but, oh, there comes a time when I long for the fresh air of face to face contact with the light, the shade, the shape, the space of the three dimensional so-called real world.
As you can see in state 2, I've introduced a still-life of my palette in the foreground and will paint this as realistically as possible. But it leads into planes and perspectives which do not exist in reality and which arise spontaneously out of of some kind of inner logic. So, while I can't claim to be resolving the conflict, at least it's an attempt to do so. Only black and white thus far but colour is coming.
MORE
Everything in the picture is an edited version of things I see around me, including parts of other artworks. Building the composition from these fragments is selectively random: if a shape catches my eye, I'll put it in but not necessarily in the same place. In this process the painting is acquiring an order that looks nothing like my cluttered studio but that you could still recognise if you walked in there.
Central to the design are the figures of my parents, five times removed from reality: I am painting them from an unfinished painting which was based on an old snapshot and they were, of course, more real than that photograph and now they are gone, though their known and unknown history is still alive in me, consciously and unconsciously, as I sit in messy upstairs studio creating an illusion of orderly space with material paints on material canvas.
In making art what has always intrigued and frustrated me is the conflict between working from life and working from imagination (which is also the conflict between abstraction and representation). I love painting from life, it's incomparably thrilling, but there always comes a point when I feel dominated, subjugated by the real and want it to get out of my way. Then down and down, round and round I go to that old black magic of inner images and concepts and that's exciting too but, oh, there comes a time when I long for the fresh air of face to face contact with the light, the shade, the shape, the space of the three dimensional so-called real world.
As you can see in state 2, I've introduced a still-life of my palette in the foreground and will paint this as realistically as possible. But it leads into planes and perspectives which do not exist in reality and which arise spontaneously out of of some kind of inner logic. So, while I can't claim to be resolving the conflict, at least it's an attempt to do so. Only black and white thus far but colour is coming.
MORE
Labels:
abstract art,
canvas,
chaos,
clutter,
DNA,
genetics,
illusion,
imagination,
order,
Painting,
palette,
parents,
perspective,
reality,
representation,
studio
Monday, June 14, 2010
UPSTAIRS AND THE UNBEARABLE NECESSITY OF CHAOS
What attracted me to this top
floor
flat when I first saw it was that it had an
upstairs: a small,
awkward-shaped, added-on loft, the sloping ceiling
high enough in the middle for me to stand upright
but not
for any taller people. A space obviously unsuitable
for large
artwork but I took it anyway. Kindly
friends helped to lug my heavy etching press up the
narrow
staircase, I had a sink installed, built racks and
shelves
for my equipment, and for quite a while the place
served
me well enough for printmaking and graphics.
Now, almost sixteen years later, it's become less of a studio and more of a chaotic storage dump. Mea culpa, yes, but I also blame the advent of the digital age. The Mac is downstairs: that explains everything, doesn't it? A computer, a graphic tablet and thou, my muse, and we can happily ignore all of that upstairs mess - the paints, the unfinished paintings, the broken frames, the stacks of paper, the smell of solvents, the greasy rags, the bits of wood, the bottles and jars and boxes and tins and tubes of art-stuff which, the less it is used, the more it accumulates in case it will be used at a later date.
But wait. Lately I've been neglecting downstairs (less blogging, less computering in general, did you notice?) and cautiously venturing back upstairs to sit there and think. A few nights ago - late night is usually my decision time - I resolved to start clearing the chaos. But then I noticed that the mess was visually quite intriguing so I decided to start a new large painting instead.
You can see its present stage in the middle of the bottom row of these photos. The painting will incorporate, in as yet unpredictable fashion, fragments of the things I see upstairs, including parts of an old, unfinished painting of my parents when young (middle row). The canvas is almost my height, the ceiling not high enough for an easel and the room too narrow and crowded to allow some other support so I have to work in a variety of crouching positions. But now I need the chaos to stay as it is because it's my current inspiration.
MORE
Now, almost sixteen years later, it's become less of a studio and more of a chaotic storage dump. Mea culpa, yes, but I also blame the advent of the digital age. The Mac is downstairs: that explains everything, doesn't it? A computer, a graphic tablet and thou, my muse, and we can happily ignore all of that upstairs mess - the paints, the unfinished paintings, the broken frames, the stacks of paper, the smell of solvents, the greasy rags, the bits of wood, the bottles and jars and boxes and tins and tubes of art-stuff which, the less it is used, the more it accumulates in case it will be used at a later date.
But wait. Lately I've been neglecting downstairs (less blogging, less computering in general, did you notice?) and cautiously venturing back upstairs to sit there and think. A few nights ago - late night is usually my decision time - I resolved to start clearing the chaos. But then I noticed that the mess was visually quite intriguing so I decided to start a new large painting instead.
You can see its present stage in the middle of the bottom row of these photos. The painting will incorporate, in as yet unpredictable fashion, fragments of the things I see upstairs, including parts of an old, unfinished painting of my parents when young (middle row). The canvas is almost my height, the ceiling not high enough for an easel and the room too narrow and crowded to allow some other support so I have to work in a variety of crouching positions. But now I need the chaos to stay as it is because it's my current inspiration.
MORE
Tuesday, June 01, 2010
TEN RANDOM QUESTIONS ABOUT LOVE
1. What is the question to
which
love is the answer?
2. Is love a feeling or an interaction?
3. Can love be felt without a love-object?
4. If it's an interaction, what's the minimum number of participants?
5. Does love of one's self feel the same as love of an other?
6. For love to persist, is a loving response required?
7. Why are love and happiness usually considered to be a pair?
8. Why are love and unhappiness so frequently seen together?
9. Can there be love without joy? Or joy without love?
10. What is this thing called love?
Any answers?
MORE
2. Is love a feeling or an interaction?
3. Can love be felt without a love-object?
4. If it's an interaction, what's the minimum number of participants?
5. Does love of one's self feel the same as love of an other?
6. For love to persist, is a loving response required?
7. Why are love and happiness usually considered to be a pair?
8. Why are love and unhappiness so frequently seen together?
9. Can there be love without joy? Or joy without love?
10. What is this thing called love?
Any answers?
MORE
Labels:
answers,
feeling,
happiness,
interaction,
joy,
love,
other love,
questions,
self-love,
unhappiness
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
THERE IS A SEASON TO UPDATE THE UPKEEP, TURN TURN TURN
Maybe it's because of the
better weather
but this time of year brings out my governmental
instincts ie: cleaning up, clearing out,
re-organising,
making new lists, tearing up old lists, feeling
guilty
about having failed to do all the things on all the
lists
sooner, and so on. The local charity shop has
received yet
another huge bundle from me and my website, the
online version
of home, is also the focus of my beady-eyed resolve
to IMPROVE
THINGS BY GETTING RID OF STUFF AND ADDING MORE STUFF
IN DIFFERENT
PLACES. Elimination followed by accumulation. Turn
turn turn.
My ART pages in particular badly need a make-over. For the moment, I've added a portrait section. You can see some recent faces over there and maybe you'd like to bookmark the URL? I'll be updating it frequently. Thanking you.
Back to my duties now.
MORE
My ART pages in particular badly need a make-over. For the moment, I've added a portrait section. You can see some recent faces over there and maybe you'd like to bookmark the URL? I'll be updating it frequently. Thanking you.
Back to my duties now.
MORE
Thursday, May 20, 2010
WORDS AND PICTURES
Dylan, creator/editor of
the brilliant tinywords,
has chosen one of my poempictures as the
cover of
the latest issue of this international daily
magazine of
haiku and micropoetry. I am lost for words to say
how
delighted I am, so a simple thank you will have to
do.
Another reason to celebrate is
that
I've finally reached what seems to me to be a happy
ending
for a portrait I've been working on lately of Jehane
Markham, a neighbour and
fine poet/playwright. As The Jehane Markham
Trio she
reads her work with a backing of two musicians - a
subtle,
original and hugely enjoyable blend of jazz and
poetry. Rough
Winds Productions was
created with her partner, the actor Roger Lloyd
Pack, "to support the search for pleasure and
understanding
in the poetic realm". You may remember I did a
sketch
of Roger reading The
Wasteland four years ago (scroll to April
13, 2006 ). He's performing it
again on June 3rd at the Free
Word Centre and Jehane will be presentingThe London
Series with
her trio. I'll be there for sure.
Jehane sat for me for two
hours
and I made a good start then proceeded
to wreck the painting slowly and surely in the next
few weeks.
There's no explanation for BUAPGSS
(Buggering-Up-A-Perfectly-Good-Start
Syndrome) but I'm sure you know what I'm
talking about. Anyway, I gradually dragged the
portrait out
of the limbo it was threatening to remain in and
did something
I haven't done before: I painted words as a
background to
the face: her words, a poem that I like so much: Fear of Falling.
Somehow it all came together then. What do you
think?
The poem is in her collection
THIRTY
POEMS published
by Rough
Winds. The last five lines, hard to read in this
photo, are:
if I'm not careful,
I'll fall right through,
knocked out by emerald knuckledusters,
the weight of water,
electric blue.
I'll fall right through,
knocked out by emerald knuckledusters,
the weight of water,
electric blue.
Portrait of Jehane
Markham with
her poem 'Fear of Falling'. Acrylic
on canvas. 50 cm x 40.5 cm. NdA May 2010
Labels:
acrylic,
art,
jazz,
Jehane Markham,
ocean,
playwright,
poem,
poet,
poetry,
portraiture,
Roger Lloyd Pack,
tinywords
Saturday, May 08, 2010
POST-ELECTION BLUES and a PORTRAIT PARTY
Very disappointed that the Lib
Dems
didn't get more votes after all the enthusiasm they
generated
during the campaign. Most of all I'm shocked by the
outrageous
excuses given for voters being turned
away from many polling
stations on election night: why isn't more fuss made
about this in the media and everywhere? Supposedly,
'an inquiry
is under way' but that just isn't good enough. If
this were
a third world country, there would be world-wide
rumblings
about ineptitude and conspiracies. But we're a
civilised,
sophisticated, efficient democracy, aren't we?
PORTRAIT PARTY
Some of us prefer art to politics and pay more attention to art than to reality and would rather play than work and can find hundreds of good reasons not to do the things we should be doing in favour of things that have no agenda other than fun. So when I saw on Walt's always fun-supporting blog a mention of Julia Kay's Portrait Party, of course I immediately had to go there and now I'm completely hooked. Here are my first three portraits of artist members of that vibrant ongoing all-day all-night party. I drew these digitally on a graphic tablet, using Artrage software for Wally and Blue Sky Day and Photoshop brushes for Allan.
PORTRAIT PARTY
Some of us prefer art to politics and pay more attention to art than to reality and would rather play than work and can find hundreds of good reasons not to do the things we should be doing in favour of things that have no agenda other than fun. So when I saw on Walt's always fun-supporting blog a mention of Julia Kay's Portrait Party, of course I immediately had to go there and now I'm completely hooked. Here are my first three portraits of artist members of that vibrant ongoing all-day all-night party. I drew these digitally on a graphic tablet, using Artrage software for Wally and Blue Sky Day and Photoshop brushes for Allan.
Sunday, May 02, 2010
ELECTIONEERING
I responded to The Guardian's
recent invitation for readers to send in
alternative election
posters but mine was not among those they chose to
print
in the G2 section last week. I'm
not
bothered since I have my own alternative audience
right here,
haven't I? So here is my take - a Photoshopped
montage
of bits and pieces borrowed from the internet - on
the three-horse
race currently taking place here in the
not-so-united Queendom.
All politicians, as far as I'm concerned, are endlessly spinning on a carousel which never stops churning out platitudes, promises and palliatives. In the first TV debate between the three current contenders for the top spinning job, the mere fact that there were three of them instead of the usual two (Labour and Conservative) made it slightly more exciting. And when the interloper Nick Clegg began to sound and look like a real human being rather than an airbrushed sound-bitten parody of one, I thought, okay, maybe he'll jump off the merry-go-round and really be the 'something different' his party political message keeps repeating. Besides, he's got an emigré Russian grandmother, a Dutch mother, a Spanish wife, children with Spanish names, and he can speak more than one language. So I'll vote for him.
MORE
All politicians, as far as I'm concerned, are endlessly spinning on a carousel which never stops churning out platitudes, promises and palliatives. In the first TV debate between the three current contenders for the top spinning job, the mere fact that there were three of them instead of the usual two (Labour and Conservative) made it slightly more exciting. And when the interloper Nick Clegg began to sound and look like a real human being rather than an airbrushed sound-bitten parody of one, I thought, okay, maybe he'll jump off the merry-go-round and really be the 'something different' his party political message keeps repeating. Besides, he's got an emigré Russian grandmother, a Dutch mother, a Spanish wife, children with Spanish names, and he can speak more than one language. So I'll vote for him.
MORE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









