<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post8003695681680200997..comments</id><updated>2009-06-13T11:36:03.931+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Blaugustine's Other Blog: ULTI-INTI EXTRACT 5</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/feeds/8003695681680200997/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html'/><author><name>Natalie d'Arbeloff</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07757081405040926647</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-2586648797957446089</id><published>2009-06-13T11:36:03.931+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T11:36:03.931+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Dominic, cubist-ish, yes. But the surrealists used...</title><content type='html'>Dominic, cubist-ish, yes. But the surrealists used the automatic writing process: any words will do, whatever comes to mind, in any order, and it won&amp;#39;t matter if you remove one word and insert another. Only they weren&amp;#39;t interested in communicating any particular feeling, only &amp;#39;letting loose&amp;#39; the unconscious. Whether the unconscious is interesting or not.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/2586648797957446089'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/2586648797957446089'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html?showComment=1244889363931#c2586648797957446089' title=''/><author><name>Natalie d'Arbeloff</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07757081405040926647</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='12207597376813303624'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-8003695681680200997' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/posts/default/8003695681680200997' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-4222790512370519893</id><published>2009-06-13T09:05:05.686+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-13T09:05:05.686+01:00</updated><title type='text'>I have you think a point :)

Would that be like "c...</title><content type='html'>I have you think a point :)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Would that be like &amp;quot;cubist writing&amp;quot;? One or two writers in the past have considered themselves &amp;quot;cubist&amp;quot;ish.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/4222790512370519893'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/4222790512370519893'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html?showComment=1244880305686#c4222790512370519893' title=''/><author><name>Dominic Rivron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02618013365521035400</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-8003695681680200997' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/posts/default/8003695681680200997' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-3938498080051217312</id><published>2009-05-19T14:10:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2009-05-19T14:10:00.000+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Linda, you're right. If I had written these notes ...</title><content type='html'>Linda, you're right. If I had written these notes (and my many journals in general) with the intention of publication, I certainly would have edited them drastically and also added lots more graphics. But since they're private inner monologues, they tend to be word-heavy. Oddly enough, looking back at a lot of stuff I wrote in the past (and there are boxes full of it!) I'm often surprised that most of it is still relevant to me in the present.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/3938498080051217312'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/3938498080051217312'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html?showComment=1242738600000#c3938498080051217312' title=''/><author><name>Natalie d'Arbeloff</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07757081405040926647</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='12207597376813303624'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-8003695681680200997' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/posts/default/8003695681680200997' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-3779849881202827832</id><published>2009-05-19T13:48:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2009-05-19T13:48:00.000+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Hi Natalie,
Looking back over your last 5 extracts...</title><content type='html'>Hi Natalie,&lt;br /&gt;Looking back over your last 5 extracts, they become more and more wordy. The first 2 have those beautiful graphics, and,as you say at the end of 5 '...more pictures'. Your notebooks are from a long time ago, if you still agreed with everything you wrote then, there would be something wrong!Have you learnt anything from looking at them afresh? It's fascinating looking back at what we once thought. I hope you'll let us see more. Best wishes, Linda.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/3779849881202827832'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/8003695681680200997/comments/default/3779849881202827832'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html?showComment=1242737280000#c3779849881202827832' title=''/><author><name>linda severn</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09198227289415621463</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='11154109051860370067'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://newnatalie.blogspot.com/2009/05/ulti-inti-extract-5.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24746593.post-8003695681680200997' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/24746593/posts/default/8003695681680200997' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>